Many of us are asking this question today, as we prepare to meet with our congregations after our General Assembly’s decision to shift our ordination policies. Immediately after the Assembly, I asked another pastor friend of mine what he would say to his congregation on Sunday. Below is his response, and beneath his response I give some practical points as well:
“In some sense that’s a peculiar question, because I’m an evangelical. What I will do Sunday is what I do every Sunday: preach the Gospel. The Gospel’s central themes are well known, its details being spelled out in Holy Scripture, the text from which we read and preach week after week. It’s about a creation gone awry, a God whose capacity to love and forgive exceeds our capacity to sin and rebel, and a hope for a glorious future where there is no more crying and no more dying – all revealed to us in the work and person of Jesus Christ. In one sense, yesterday’s events have very little impact on what I’ll preach on Sunday. Misguided decisions of ecclesial assemblies don’t do anything to diminish or obscure God’s victory over sin, death and the devil.
But from another perspective, in all honesty, I suppose recent events will have something to do with how I approach things on Sunday. It’s not as if the Gospel has undergone any fundamental change. Jesus doesn’t change. We know this because of the constancy of God’s Word and the presence of God’s Spirit. But the context into which we speak these great truths has changed and is always changing. So what’s the word for this time and place?
The church is sinful but God is faithful. In the midst of corruption, deception, and confusion in the Church, which at times like this seems as Babylonian as the world, the Gospel lifts high the cross. The cross judges all human sin and subterfuge, whether in the Church or in the world. It is God’s word to our confused and broken church. But it is not the last word. There is another word, equally abiding but much more hopeful. There is the word of the resurrection. Many of us are as confused, afraid and despairing as that original band of disciples first faced with the loss of the Master. The risen Christ speaks the same word to us as to them. He shares his peace and bids us not to fear. He is with us now and to the end of the age.
We live in a world of sound bites and reductionisms. If we conform to its norms we will offer our churches a truncated Gospel that will elicit cynical despair or naïve optimism. The Gospel of Jesus Christ offers another way. It gives us and those we’re called to lead a true picture of the harsh and stark realities of our sin, exponentially more severe when we coalesce in community. But the Gospel doesn’t end there. The proclamation of the cross is meaningless without the hope of the resurrection. In the words of the Task Force: “It’s a package deal.” And this is the package evangelicals will preach on Sunday. The package that comes to us in the incarnation of the one who is both fully God and fully human, also a package deal. We evangelicals must neglect neither side of the package. We do our church a disservice if we proclaim to the church the stark reality of our sin without the boundless hope of the resurrection. Likewise, we offer nothing the world doesn’t offer if we preach the power of positive thinking, ignoring the profound brokenness, sin and corruption that was manifested in the Assembly’s recent actions.
In an age where the church is filled with negative naysayers and manipulative spin-doctors, evangelicals must preach the Gospel of the whole package. This holistic Gospel is made clear on every page of Holy Scripture. What will we say to our congregations on Sunday? That will be dictated by the passages of Scripture we are led to and the context into which we speak it. Wherever these realities lead us, the center is still the same: Jesus Christ, fully God, fully human, the One whose life, death and resurrection gives us a completely accurate picture of ourselves and our church. God has given us the gift of the Gospel, and with it gives us himself in and as Christ and through the Spirit. In doing so God offers us real, true and deep healing and opens up the possibility for the transformation of our church, our world, and first and foremost ourselves.
What will we say to our congregations on Sunday? The details will differ from place to place but the center must remain the same: not a center devised by calculating political strategists or polity experts but the center who reconciles all things to himself…Jesus Christ. His is the glory, the honor, the power, now and forever. Nothing that happened this week changes that. Thanks be to God.”
We would do well to heed this exhortation. Many at the Assembly felt like its decision on the PUP Report changes everything. And in one sense there’s some truth to this. But in light God’s enduring faithfulness and the victory promised to us in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, very little has changed at all. We are called to press on, assured of the hope of glory which no Assembly can render a non-essential.
Still, people will want some practical guidance and basic information. There are several things pastors might want to share in an adult education class or at a congregational meeting:
- Our constitutional standards have not changed. They all remain in place, including G-6.0106b, which requires that candidates for ordination live in fidelity in marriage or chastity in singleness. This essential biblical teaching is one candidates for ordained office in our church must abide by, according to our Book of Order. This standard is still in place.
- The way our standards are applied may have changed. Exactly how they may have changed is not clear. Every ordained officer vows to uphold the essentials of Reformed faith and polity as spelled out in our constitution. But what those essentials are may now be left up to local governing bodies (presbyteries and sessions) to determine for themselves. We may find ourselves in a situation where a Presbytery or Session ordains someone in clear violation of our biblically rooted constitutional standards, and we may not be able to do anything about it. We will live in a time where everyone will be forced to do what is right in their own eyes.
- It is clear that the intention of the Task Force was to allow for those disregarding the seventh commandment to be able to be ordained and installed as church leaders. What isn’t clear is whether or not the Assembly’s action will be able to make good on the Task Force’s intentions. The constitutional experts are not in agreement. Pray that our constitutional standards will be lifted up and vindicated despite the erroneous judgment rendered by the Assembly.
- The renewal groups are united. We are committed to
upholding the constitution. Truth is on our side, and we are trusting
that God will vindicate the truth of His Word. At the same time, we are
seeking God’s will for the future and entertaining a range of faithful,
biblical, evangelical responses to our current crisis. If basic biblical faithfulness has no future in the PC(USA), we
will see to it that God’s people are equipped to sing a new song in a
new land. As we discern the mind of Christ together, we are free to be faithful, and we must
remain united as evangelical Presbyterians. I encourage you to attend
the summer events, especially that of the Presbyterian Global Fellowship. - Your
session and presbytery could take certain steps to help ensure that
biblical and faithful standards for ordination are upheld locally. Click here for further analysis of the Assembly’s actions and for a practical suggestion.

7 Comments Received
June 24th, 2006 @4:34 pm
PCUSA members have to wake up to the reality that their denomination is long gone to unfaithfulness. Gresham Machen saw that in the 1920s, and so OPC was born.
Our Reformed fathers have a three-fold definition of what a true church is: “The church engages in the pure preaching of the gospel; it makes use of the pure administration of the sacraments as Christ instituted them; it practices church discipline for correcting faults” (Belgic Confession, Art. 29). It’s incontrovertible that there’s hardly any PCUSA church (or most “evangelical”) churches that has even two of these three marks.
When a church becomes a false church, it’s time to leave the church. Many Christians are deceived into thinking that they can be of influence within a false church. PCUSA members must ask themselves this question: Is there any church/denomination that has gone back to Scriptural faithfulness after it has walked the path of unfaithfulness? I don’t know of any.
I realize that leaving the denomination involves many personal and financial relations, and undoubtedly doctrinal issues, and will cause rifts within families and friends. However, if the Lord wills, majority of your pastors and their congregations will decide to leave your wayward denomination.
Nevertheless, I don’t think that PCUSA congregations should band together and form a new denomination. Many faithful Presbyterian and Reformed denominations are already there, e.g., OPC, PCA, URCNA, RPCNA, to name a few.
The Lord be with you all.
June 24th, 2006 @5:52 pm
I think that you forgot the EPC.
I have a question, “What do we do with Paul’s words to the Corinthians, which were inspired by the Holy Spirit, concerning being unequally yoked with unbelievers?” I realize that some of you believe the other side of the coin are believers. I want you to note that Paul is using the description of oxen yoked together here. The Old Testament did not believe that a mother and her calf oxen should be yoked together nor shoul anyone yoke an ox and a donkey or any other animal together.
When we are yoked to the liberal leadership of this denomination, we go where the senior ox goes and do what it does. The question is, “Are we yoked to the Lord Jesus Christ or to sinful man?”
I believe that it is imperative that we are in prayer over this breaking of the 7th commandment.
June 24th, 2006 @8:29 pm
I was on the Ecclesiology committee and worked closely w/ Jim Tony and Mary Naelgli. Here is what I am sending out to my church; we are in need of saving churches from leaving; I am no more about doom-saying (as was my speech at GA), but about trying to keep people from leaving.
Kathy Sizer
Dear friends,
I believe there will be little if no local effect from the PUP report.
Los Ranchos Presbytery will continue to make decisions about leaders; our own church will continue to make decisions about its leaders; no one will force us to do anything beyond that. Think of it as sort of like “states’ rights” vs. federalism. Locally, we have gained a bit of power (usually we like that, don’t we!). We won’t like what some others will do with their local power, but it will not effect us.
At GA, we made a few amendments to the report that we believe will help to soften its effects. Thought you all might to see the following words from one of my friends who helped us work against the PUP report. I love her quote: “The PUPpy is still running around, but its leash was shortened.”
The process was fair and hard fought. We made every argument in the book, and we made them well. I was one of the major spokespersons in our committee and on the plenary floor against passing the PUP report (rec. 5). The great middle of the church was not voting about sexuality, but about an overwhelming desire to get out of “the ditch” we’ve been in (fighting over sexuality) and get on with doing the work of the church. That is what I long to do. Let’s do it together w/ our brothers and sisters in the PCUSA; no matter what they think about this issue, I find them to be faithful disciples who love Jesus Christ just as much as I do.
Thank you for all your prayers and support. I am physically and emotionally exhausted and glad to be leaving town Monday!
Kathy
Original Message
From: my friend
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: Praise God!
“Dear Kathy,
You all did a fantastic job on the floor of General Assembly; I was so proud
of you. And you know, we accomplished =a lot more= than you have been given
credit for. I am hoping justice will be done on that score soon. The
amended versions of both Rec. 4 and 5 significantly change their application
(I’ve been saying, “the PUPpy is still running around, but its leash was
shortened”), I am absolutely sure of this. The rhetoric (from our renewal
groups) in response is erroneously harsh and doomsday. But mark my words,
within a couple of months, people, especially on the other side, are going
to see what they are working with, and they are not going to get much
“leeway” after all. Please be encouraged by this. I have spoken at length
with the stated clerks of San Francisco Presbytery and Redwoods Presbytery,
and the Executive Presbyters of San Francisco, San Joaquin and Los
Ranchos‹they all agree that the amendment from the floor was hugely
significant and takes the stinger out of this thing.
This is the message I am taking home to our renewal-minded folks in my presbytery.”
June 25th, 2006 @5:48 am
After coming out with a fairly straightforward, clear statement upholding the authority of scripture over loyalty to our small c church. This release has some comments within it that are already pulling back from such a solid stand.
Don’t do that! Stand firm! The ACC ruled during the debate what the amendments did and didn’t do to #5 and all the spinning in the world the denominational loyalists do will not change it.
Our ultimate loyalty is to God and our being a part of the big C Church far outweighs our little c church affections. In fact, a strong stand within our little c for God’s clearly revealed truth is our service to God and the big C Church.
Don’t go back to Egypt—don’t do it.
God’s blesings to you,
Matt
June 25th, 2006 @8:08 am
Greetings in the Name of our Lord Jesus!
Kathy, in your post above you mention churches leaving and how concerned you are about it.
Where are they leaving to? They are not leaving the big C Church, but only a little c church.
Why is that such huge issue with you? Especially in light that by their actions they are seeking greater faithfulness to God’s call in their collective lives.
That is why our property clause is so okay, it is evil. Other reformed bodies do not have it (PCA and EPC as examples) and we should not. If we are about churches seeking faithfulness to God at their ultimate goal rather than faithfulness to some little c church then we wouldn’t have such a clause as that property one.
So, why are you so concerned about churches following as God is leading them?
God’s blessings to you,
Matt
June 26th, 2006 @9:16 pm
“What do we say to our churches?” Many of us were asking ourselves that question as members filed in for worship with questions like, “Is it true that they made it ok to ordain people who don’t believe in Jesus?”
What do we say to our churches? We were prepared to say something in response to inaccuracies in media reporting, but these members have seen a 3/4 page paid advertisement composed by ministers from our presbytery and placed in our daily paper. Lifting almost verbatim language from your renewal movements, these ministers gave us congregations full of confused and alarmed worshipers on the Lord’s Day.
What do we say to our churches? That’s the easy question. Undoubtedly, the harder question is now, “What do I say to my colleagues?”
July 5th, 2006 @4:14 am
I continue to pray for the PCUSA. I left for the CRC in the midst of a personal crisis and the need for a new address several years ago. Yet, i still love the PCUSA and find myself hoping that the Reformed Bodies (Presbyterian and Reformed) can somehow hang together. But, that won’t happen with unorthodox trinitarian formulations and ordination practices that ignore scripture and historical church practices. It is with love that i urge evangelical/orthodox pastors and laypersons to hang in there and continue to fight the good fight. you have friends and prayer partners in the CRC who love you and are cheering for you. blessings on all!
Leave A Reply